Bookworm in Public











{June 22, 2009}   The Trouble with Books

The problem with me, when it comes to literature, is that there are so many books I want to read. This is usually a good thing, but when it’s the week of my school finals and I’m going away for a weekend immediately after that, having eight books I want to read is not the best way to spend my time. As much as I would love to start a new book, for the sake of this blog that hasn’t gotten very large yet, I’m going to try to make myself read all of East of Eden before I move on. Perhaps I’ll break it up with some interpretations of Shakespeare’s sonnets in between chapters and tangents.

Coming up on the list of books I want to read are, in order that I hope I get to read them,

  • East of Eden
  • Wuthering Heights
  • Uncle Tom’s Cabin
  • Jane Eyre
  • Emma
  • Sense and Sensibility
  • Northanger Abbey
  • Breaking Dawn (I read part of it before and gave up)

So that is the list as it stands, though it’s probably going to change a lot. I have to free up time in  my schedule, maybe devote less time to browsing the internet and more time to books. That’s usually beneficial. I’m going to be busy in the next couple of months but I will get all of these read if it’s the last thing I do. I also have more summer reading books I simply have to get to.

Tonight if I can’t get caught up in EoE I might have to start a new book. We’ll see how it goes. You might have noticed that on the first East of Eden page I linked to it on Amazon.com – this is because I figure, if you want to read it you might as well be able to get to it quickly. So that’s that, if you’re interested. I’ll be linking once to every book I read, on the first entry about it.

Book suggestions are, as always, more than welcome. I’ll read any genre or author, except for horror. I have an overactive imagination, really.

~Gretta



To be perfectly honest, I can’t stand the man. Cyrus, Adam Trask’s father, clearly played a huge role in shaping his son’s life and his son’s views, because he was primarily responsible for the discipline and regular life lessons of his children, as opposed to his wife who merely cared for them basics-wise.

Yes, he was there for his children as in he did what he felt was best for them (which I disagree with) and he was, I’m sure, an awe-inspiring figure to have as a father, but he lied. About everything he ever did. And maybe that was a good thing at first, just because it made him feel better about not being able to fight for more than…a few days, honestly.

But when the lies he told about being at every battle and every meeting started to become his own reality, instead of feeling badly for him, I just got angry. He created a demi-god for his sons to worship and his wife to respect, a person who did not exist. He cheated on his first wife and contracted gonorrhea, and got his leg shattered in the first battle he fought in. I wouldn’t call that at all admirable. And yet his stories became his life.

Perhaps Steinbeck considered it redeeming that Cyrus was an expert at war, and his strategy and his ideas were genius. He had a knack for all things fighting-oriented, but when it got to the point where I as the reader couldn’t tell if things happening were real or made up, it was just annoying. Adam, Cyrus’ older son, grows up revering his father, and fearing him. When he spoke of battles, maybe he was always right but it was not because he’d been there an experienced it. He studied.

It would have been less frustrating if he had at least admitted that he had hardly fought. But his lies were to keep him going as well as his family – and it seems very cowardly to have to believe your own lies instead of the real truth. I can only imagine how crushed and disappointed Adam would be if he ever learned that his father was not the war hero he claimed to be.

I have to wonder if anyone would even have believed him if he’d come out and said, “I lied. I didn’t really fight at every single battle in the Civil War, my stories aren’t true.” But he didn’t, because he probably didn’t even realize that he was lying. I find it disgusting and not at all admirable. He seems like a horrible person – and then that’s not even talking about the way he treated his second wife, Alice. She was good in his eyes only for housework and maintenance. He dealt with the discipline, the raising of the children. He really only wanted her because he wanted someone to take care of Adam – as in, meet the basic needs and make sure he had food and stayed clean.

Some father he was.

There was one part in the book that I’ve read so far that redeemed him some as a person – and that is the conversation he has with Adam about life and why he wants Adam to become a soldier so badly, on page 27.

You asked a question. I guess I’ll have to answer. Maybe it’s good and maybe it’s bad to answer it. You’re not clever. You don’t know what you want. You have no proper fierceness. You let other people walk over you. Sometimes I think you’re a weakling who will never amount to a dog turd. Does that answer your question? I love you better. I always have. This may be a bad thing to tell you, but it’s true. I love you better. Else why would I have given myself the trouble of hurting you? Now shut your mouth and go to your supper.

It is a long conversation between the pair of them about life and why certain things have to happen. I sort of expected Cyrus to come out and say that he had lied, but he didn’t. It was to that respect not redeeming but I did admire the way he spoke to his son.

Of course later on that gets Adam beat up by his brother, Charles, who is very jealous. But even Cyrus’ reaction to that is good – he wants to kill Charles, and would if he found him before his rage died down. It is because of this that Adam becomes even more the loved son. I guess in the end Cyrus was a good father, if not a good man. I still do not like him, though. And I don’t think that’s going to change.

Comment if you disagree.



{June 20, 2009}   East of Eden: Chapters 1-4

Well to be perfectly honest, I was surprised to make it this far and not hate it. I suppose this is why you shouldn’t make judgments about a book before you start reading them. I cared more about Samuel Hamilton, who briefly appeared after the description/boring part was over and the story finally started, than I did about the other family, the Trasks, who I suspect the story is mainly about based on the jacket information.

I think Samuel appeals to me primarily because he’s Irish, and his life isn’t perfect. He’s smart, but he doesn’t get everything he’s wanted, and he is terrible at business so he doesn’t make any money. He seems nice, and his wife seemed rather ridiculous, I didn’t like her at all.

So it was really weird when all of a sudden, just as I was getting drawn into Samuel’s story and wondering what role he was going to play, it switched to this Adam character, and then started talking about his childhood – but I got confused a lot, because Steinbeck was not clear if he was talking about Adam or Adam’s father Cyrus for the entirety of the beginning of Chapter 2. So I went a whole two pages thinking that he’d skipped Adam’s childhood and Adam was grown up and married to a girl named Alice.

And then he said something about Adam’s childhood and I did a double take… and had to sort it all out. Which was kind of frustrating to deal with. I am not a patient reader, I like either enjoying what I’m reading or being confused in a good way – but not in a WHEN DID THAT HAPPEN? sort of way. And I just got mad.

The more I read the more I started to wonder when the Adam and Eve story was going to begin. In the book jacket it says that Adam lives out that bible story, while his sons live out Cain and Abel. But all I’m getting is the impression that Adam and his own brother Charles are actually living out C&A, not the other way around and not in the future. It’s kind of hard to figure out.

Charles is that terribly jealous brother who thinks (correctly) that his father loves Adam more and as a result…tries to kill Adam… which fails miserably, thank goodness, or else there wouldn’t be much of a story.

I feel like I should be going more in depth about this book but I can’t be bothered right now. That I will do later when I don’t have a ton of energy to use moving around. Mkay? Basically Adam gets the crap beat out of him, and then he goes off to fight in the war, because his father (ooh do I have things to say about his father) signs him up to do so.



{June 20, 2009}   East of Eden

So today I’m starting East of Eden, by John Steinbeck. No, it’s not something I would have curled up to read on my own. It’s required reading for school next year, so I have to get it done at some point this summer. I honestly haven’t read more than a few pages yet but I’m already a bit apprehensive – just from reading the inside jacket. I try not to judge a book by its cover but I’ve never read Steinbeck before and I’m a bit nervous. I haven’t heard the best things about him.

When you’re not a Bible-loving person to say the least and you pick up a book that is apparently about a family reliving the story of Adam and Eve, you have to wonder exactly what you’re getting yourself in for. And I’m going to give it a chance because I don’t really have a choice but I’m intrigued already and hoping it won’t get very preachy about religion and all that good stuff.

To be perfectly honest the first couple of pages almost put me to sleep. It’s just description about where this guy lives, and he’s doing some pretty obvious foreshadowing – “I always found in myself a dread of west and a love of east” (Page 1). Really? Already? Something’s going to happen with those directions, I’m going to go ahead and make that call now.

There was something I found really interesting, however, and that’s the letter Steinbeck wrote to Pascal Covici. I looked up this guy, and apparently he was Steinbeck’s editor, and the box Steinbeck refers to is a box that he delivered the manuscript of East of Eden in.  (source)

So we’ll see how it goes… I’ll be updating later as soon as I actually get time to read more.



{June 20, 2009}   From the Bookshelf

Welcome to my newest blog, Bookworm in Public. This is not only for my reference, but for your entertainment. I tend to read everything I can get my hands on, and this summer I want to do a lot more reading than I usually do. And some of the books I have to read for school do not look that wonderful.

What this blog is going to be is a record of the books I read, and summaries and analysis of them – but keep in mind it won’t always be serious. If I’m reading a book I detest? Yeah, the comments are going to be cynical. These posts are for entertainment purposes, don’t take me seriously if you’re thinking about not giving a book a chance.

Unless, of course, the book in question is Twilight, in which case I will tell you now, never EVER read them. Ever. It’s a waste of your time, really. You can do so much better. They will kill your mind.

Currently I have a list of books a mile long, including but not limited to:

  • Les Miserables
  • East of Eden
  • The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin
  • Breaking Dawn
  • some of the LotR books
  • rereading of the Harry Potter books
  • Farewell to Manzanar
  • Wuthering Heights

So as you can see I have a lot of books to read. As I go chapter by chapter I will be posting summaries and thoughts – they won’t all be serious, but it’ll be about what the chapter or book makes me think of, and basically some analysis. This is my summer project. If it works out nicely I might keep it going at the end of summer.

At any rate, enjoy my ramblings!

~Gretta



et cetera
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.